10 SaaS Founders Wanted: 14 Days of GEO Tracker AI Pro

Petr GEO Tracker AI1mo agoReply

Hi, did you see the email from me?

Petr GEO Tracker AI1mo agoReply

> Absolutely — there’s a spot for Banalo.business.
>
> Which market matters most for you right now: US, Europe, Asia, or another specific market? That will help us set the right buyer queries and competitor context.
>
> Quick note for transparency: English-language research is currently the strongest. We can test other languages too, but Cyrillic and Hindi/Devanagari queries may be less reliable in the current version.

Sahil Thakur1mo agoReply

↳ Replying to Petr GEO Tracker AI

India for now, that's our core market. Long term we're thinking global, but want to nail this market first.

Good to know about the language limitation, not a concern for us though, our audience researches in English anyway.

Petr GEO Tracker AI1mo agoReply

↳ Replying to Sahil Thakur

Great — India first, English queries. That gives us a solid starting point 🙌
One thing I’ve learned during roughly eight months of building GEO Tracker AI: real GEO / AEO / AI-search measurement is part science, part alchemy 🙂
It’s not only about the language of the prompt. The market, country and regional context can change which products, sources, directories and competitors appear in an AI answer. GEO Tracker AI is currently strongest for English-language research in North America and Europe. We’ve added more countries and languages, but India is a market we still want to validate carefully rather than pretend it works perfectly from day one.
We saw this even in the Czech market: price-comparison sites, directories and listings were initially appearing alongside actual competitors. We had to identify and classify them separately, because mixing them together changes everything — visibility score, share of voice, mentions and the actions we recommend.
We’re currently improving our free snapshot methodology based on recent testing and learnings. Once that update is ready — hopefully later today or tomorrow — I’ll run a manual internal check for Banalo.business with India + English buyer queries, and look at the specific market patterns we find.
If you can share a little more about how Indian customers describe the problem — especially the words they use around perfume formulation, supplier sourcing and D2C tools — that would be extremely useful. Then we’ll test it properly together. Thanks for being willing to help us push the limits of GEO Tracker AI 🚀

Sahil Thakur1mo agoReply

↳ Replying to Petr GEO Tracker AI

Makes sense, appreciate you being upfront about validating India carefully rather than assuming it works out of the box, that's the right approach honestly.

On the specific language piece, still gathering that data myself. early days, so i don't have a clean list of the exact phrases yet.
What i can share is the problem in plain terms: people search around things like finding perfume oil suppliers, MOQ, packaging vendors, and figuring out actual margins before committing money, but the specific words they use, i want to actually go back and check real user language before giving you something half guessed.

Happy to dig into this properly and share once i have it, rather than give you noisy data now.

Petr GEO Tracker AI1mo agoReply

↳ Replying to Sahil Thakur

> Perfect — that’s exactly the right approach. I’ll get the first checks running and see what we find. I’ll keep you posted.
>
> As I mentioned, no rush on the language data — real user wording is much more valuable than guesses. Thanks again for your time and willingness to test this with us 🙌

Petr GEO Tracker AI1mo agoReply

↳ Replying to Sahil Thakur

Hi Sahil — right now, we can’t measure the Indian market accurately. The system would fall back to its default US-based measurement, so the results wouldn’t be meaningful for Banalo.Business or useful for decisions in India.

We’re looking into adding proper India-specific measurement, but we can’t responsibly give an exact timeline or confirmation date for a full Indian-market integration yet.

Petr GEO Tracker AI1mo agoReply

Hi Hugo — absolutely, welcome aboard! 🙌
Please register normally at GEO Tracker AI with the email you’d like to use, and explore everything you can find. I’ll make sure your 14 days of Pro access are set up.
If anything does not work, feels confusing, seems unnecessary, or simply does not make sense, please email us straight away at support — even while you are still testing. I try to respond as quickly as possible, and the reply will come directly from me, not an automated or AI agent.
I’m grateful for every piece of feedback, especially the negative kind. What works in our internal tests may not work at all for a real e-commerce founder or for someone building an AI Buyer Simulator — and that is exactly what helps us improve.
Looking forward to hearing what you find! 🚀

Petr GEO Tracker AI1mo agoReply

Hi Hugo — I had a quick look at Glaudimax. The core proposition is clear: it helps e-commerce teams see what an AI shopping agent can discover, understand and act on from a public product URL.
One early GEO observation: the site is currently a single-page MVP on a Vercel subdomain. That is not a technical issue by itself — Vercel pages can be crawled, and a custom domain does not automatically create authority. But it does mean there is currently a very small evidence base.
There are no visible supporting pages yet for use cases, methodology, FAQ, documentation, customer proof, or a deeper explanation of who the product is for. That makes it harder to create highly specific buyer queries and for AI/search systems to connect Glaudimax with a clear category and problem.
I would not assume GEO Tracker will necessarily fall back: we can create an initial grounded baseline from the landing page, then improve it with your target audience, market, use cases and competitors. But without that context, the prompts will likely be broader. And as an early MVP, there may simply be little independent web evidence or third-party mention yet — which is a normal starting baseline, not a verdict on the product.
The highest-leverage next step would be a canonical custom domain plus a fuller site: clear ICP, use cases, how the simulator works, methodology, FAQ, pricing and eventually independent launch/listing/customer mentions. The domain itself will not change GEO results; the stronger content and external evidence around it will.

Petr GEO Tracker AI1mo agoReply

↳ Replying to Petr GEO Tracker AI

One practical recommendation: I would buy and use the final custom domain now. It is inexpensive, and it avoids having to move the brand, canonical URLs, links and accumulated search signals from a Vercel subdomain later.
It will not create authority overnight, but it gives every future page, mention and backlink one stable home from day one.

hugo acevedo1mo agoReply

↳ Replying to Petr GEO Tracker AI

Thanks Petr — this is genuinely useful feedback.I agree about the domain. Glaudimax was built very quickly as an MVP because I wanted to validate the idea before investing too much into the surrounding site. Your point about building the evidence base from the final domain from day one makes a lot of sense.
I’ll keep the methodology, use cases and FAQ in mind as the next layer. Really appreciate you taking the time to look at it properly. 🙌

Petr GEO Tracker AI1mo agoReply

↳ Replying to hugo acevedo

I completely understand — we are in a very similar position. We do not have an investor or a financial backer behind us; GEO Tracker AI is funded from our own resources and family budget. 🙂
We also started with local development and testing, then moved to a Vercel subdomain once the MVP was working. But as we added the database, multiple AI engines, APIs and dozens of environment variables, we moved to our real domain even before feeling that every part of the project had been fully validated.
The domain was one of the smallest investments, but it avoided a future migration of URLs, code paths, redirects, Stripe webhooks and similar integrations. I have done that migration on other projects before, and it is amazing how long you can spend later finding one forgotten reference that breaks something.
And in our case, we are building a product that measures online visibility and evidence. It felt important to build that visibility on our own permanent domain from the start as well.
We know the product works, and the growing AI visibility space gives us confidence that the problem is real. Now the work is refinement — but also marketing and sales on several levels at the same time. A product does not need to be 100% perfect before it can help customers and become a business. The important thing is to keep improving it while getting it in front of the right people.